Evidence Hub

A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Active-controlled, Parallel Group, Pivotal Study to Investigate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Murepavadin Combined With One Anti-pseudomonal Antibiotic Versus Two Anti-pseudomonal Antibiotics in Adult Subjects With Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia Suspected or Confirmed to be Due to Pseudomonas Aeruginosa

ClinicalTrials.gov · TERMINATED, 2019

41 participants

Abstract

This is a phase 3, multicenter, open-label, randomized active-controlled, parallel group to investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous murepavadin combined with of one anti-pseudononas antibiotic with that of two anti-pseudomonas antibiotics in the treatment of ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) in adult subjects.

Conditions: Pneumonia.

Primary outcome: Clinical cure rate.

Enrollment: 41 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 41 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free