Evidence Hub

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparative Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Intravenous Tigecycline Vs Intravenous Levofloxacin To Treat Subjects Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Pneumonia

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2005

434 participants

Abstract

To compare the efficacy and safety of IV tigecycline to IV levofloxacin in the treatment of subjects with CAP requiring hospitalization.

Conditions: Community-Acquired Infections, Bacterial Pneumonia, Cross Infection.

Primary outcome: Clinical response in the clinically evaluable population and the clinical modified intent-to-treat population at the TOC visit.; Determine whether tigecycline is noninferior to levofloxacin..

Enrollment: 434 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 434 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free