Evidence Hub

A Multicenter, Randomized Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous and/or Oral Levofloxacin versus Ceftriaxone and/or Cefuroxime Axetil in Treatment of Adults with Community-Acquired Pneumonia

T. M. File, John Segreti, L. A. Dunbar, Rick Player, Richard B. Kohler, R. Rex Williams, C Kojak, Adalberto Sperb Rubin et al.

Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice, 1998

17 citations

Abstract

This study was a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of levofloxacin with that of ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime in the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. The decisions to hospitalize patients, to use an intravenous or oral antimicrobial agent, and to add erythromycin or doxy-cycline to the cephalosporin regimen were made at the investigator's discretion. Four hundred fifty-six patients (226 given levofloxacin and 230 given ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil) were evaluable for efficacy. Clinical success at 5–7 days posttherapy was 96% in the levofloxacin group and 90% in the cephalosporin group. Microbio-logic success rates were 98% for levofloxacin and 85% for cephalosporin. Both drugs eradicated 100% of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Adverse effects were similar in both groups. The authors conclude that levofloxacin is superior to ceftriaxone and cefuroxime axetil therapy in the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free