Evidence Hub

Current trends in the epidemiology of multidrug-resistant and beta-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Asia and Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Salleh MZ, Nik Zuraina NMN, Deris ZZ, Mohamed Z

PeerJ, 2025

20 citations

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa continues to be a significant contributor to high morbidity and mortality rates worldwide, particularly due to its role in severe infections such as hospital-acquired conditions, including ventilator-associated pneumonia and various sepsis syndromes. The global increase in antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) P. aeruginosa strains has made these infections more difficult to treat, by limiting the effective drug options available. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to provide an updated summary of the prevalence of AMR P. aeruginosa over the past 5 years. A systematic search was performed across three major electronic databases-PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science-yielding 40 eligible studies published between 2018 and 2023. Using a random-effects model, our meta-analysis estimated that the overall prevalence of P. aeruginosa in Asia and Africa over the past 5 years was 22.9% (95% CI [14.4-31.4]). The prevalence rates for multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) P. aeruginosa strains were found to be 46.0% (95% CI [37.1-55.0]) and 19.6% (95% CI [4.3-34.9]), respectively. Furthermore, the prevalence rates of extended-spectrum β-lactamase- and metallo-β-lactamase-producing P. aeruginosa were 33.4% (95% CI [23.6-43.2]) and 16.0% (95% CI [9.8-22.3]), respectively. Notably, resistance rates to β-lactams used for treating pseudomonal infections were alarmingly high, with rates between 84.4% and 100.0% for cephalosporins, and over…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free