Evidence Hub

Comparative efficacy and safety of treatment regimens for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in people living with HIV - A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

S. Hatzl, Florian Posch, Laura Scholz, Christina Geiger, Lisa Kriegl, Philipp Kreuzer, P. Eller, D. Giacobbe et al.

Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 2024

1,788 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) is a serious opportunistic infection in people living with HIV (PWH) who have low CD4 counts. Despite its side effects, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is currently considered the primary treatment for PCP.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy (treatment-failure and mortality) and tolerability (treatment change) of PCP treatment-regimens with a frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA).

DATA SOURCES

Embase, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL from inception to February 3, 2024.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Comparative randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of at least two PCP treatment regimens.

PARTICIPANTS

PWH.

INTERVENTIONS

Treatment regimens for PCP compared head-to-head.

ASSESSMENT OF RISK-OF-BIAS

Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs (RoB2) DATA SYNTHESIS: Title, abstract, and full-text screening, along with data extraction, were conducted by two independent reviewers. Data on PCP treatment-failure, all-cause mortality, and discontinuation due to toxicity were pooled and ranked.

RESULTS

Fourteen RCTs conducted between 1983 and 1996 included 1,788 participants across 27 treatment-arms. No regimen showed statistically significant superiority over TMP-SMX in direct comparison. In the network meta-analysis, Clindamycin/Primaquine ranked best (surface-under-the-cumulative-ranking-curve, 0.8), followed by IV Pentamidine (0.8) and TMP-SMX (0.8) regarding treatment-failure. Regarding all-cause-mortality, TMP-SMX was superior to atovaquone in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,788 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free