Evidence Hub

The efficacy of azithromycin combined with seven types of Chinese medicine injections in the treatment of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Xing-Gui Huang, Sian Tao, Chen-Hao Liu, Xiaoluo Sun, Yule Hao, Yu-Qi Ma, Yi Liu, Jibin Liu

Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2024

15,014 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (MPP) is the predominant community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in children aged 5 years or older. In recent decades, the annual increase in drug resistance rates of macrolide antibiotics, particularly azithromycin (AZ), has led to complex clinical treatment strategies and substantial healthcare costs associated with MPP. Chinese medicine injections (CMIs), recognized as an effective supplementary therapy, are acknowledged by clinicians in China. It is necessary to explore the efficacy of azithromycin in combination with CMIs. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating azithromycin in combination with seven types of CMIs for MPP in children were identified based on inclusion criteria and assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2.0). R 4.3.1 and STATA 15.0 were employed to generate ranking probabilities and perform network meta-analysis. Competing interventions were ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities. Results A comprehensive analysis was performed on 155 RCTs involving 15,014 patients and 8 therapeutic strategies within this Bayesian network meta-analysis (BNMA). The results indicated that AZ combined with seven types of CMIs was more effective than azithromycin alone in overall outcomes. Notably, azithromycin combined with Chuanhuning injection (AZ + CHN) achieved the highest ranking in improving the clinical effectiveness rate (SUCRA, 80.89%); regarding secondary outcome…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 15,014 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free