Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Integrated Maxing Shigan Decoction and Azithromycin for Mycoplasma Pneumoniae Pneumonia in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Qiong Huang, Qiong Zhang, Si-Jian Li

Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 2023

5,704 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background. The primary objective of this study was to thoroughly assess the effectiveness of treating pediatric mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (MPP) with Maxing Shigan decoction (MSD) and azithromycin. Materials and Methods. We comprehensively reviewed the literature for randomized controlled trials research on MPP treated by MSD combined with azithromycin in children in the databases of Medicine, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, PubMed, CNKI, WangFang, and VIP from inception to April 2021. dds ratio (OR) was used for dichotomous data, while the mean difference (MD) was adopted for continuous variables as effect size, both of which were demonstrated in effect size and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results. A total of 49 studies with 5704 patients were included in the meta‐analysis. The results showed that MSD combined with azithromycin significantly improved the clinical efficacy (OR = 5.31, 95% CI: (4.35, 6.49), and p < 0.001) and reduced the chest X‐rays recovery time (MD = −2.25, 95% CI: (−2.86, −1.65), and p < 0.001), cough duration (MD = −2.53, 95% CI: (−2.93. −2.12), and p < 0.001), CRP (MD = −7.84, 95% CI: (−9.51, −6.17), and p < 0.001), fever duration (MD = −1.53, 95% CI: (−1.78, −1.28), and p < 0.001), hospital days (MD = −2.70, 95% CI: (−3.35, −2.06), and p < 0.001), moist rales duration (MD = −2.00, 95% CI: (−2.33, −1.68), and p < 0.001), and adverse effects (OR = 0.55, 95% CI: (0.41, 0.75), and p < 0.001) when compared with azithromycin alone in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 5,704 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free