Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of normobaric hyperoxia for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Qingyuan Chen, Zhuo-Xi Wu, Feng Chen, Jingyun Wang, Xinming Ye, Hong Li

EClinicalMedicine, 2025

804 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Summary Background The neuroprotective effects of normobaric hyperoxia (NBHO) for treating acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the safety and functional outcomes of NBHO in AIS patients. Methods We searched major databases until November 13, 2025, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NBHO (≥2 h within 24 h of onset) with room air or low-flow oxygen in adult patients with AIS. Two reviewers independently screened studies, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. The primary outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] scores 0–2) at three months. Secondary outcomes included reduced disability (ordinal shift across mRS grades 0–6), early neurological recovery (changes in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] within 7 days), and infarct volume changes. Safety outcomes included 90-day mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and pneumonia. Outcomes eligible for meta-analysis were analyzed using a random-effects model (Paule-Mandel heterogeneity estimation) with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman (HKSJ) adjustment for the primary analysis and without HKSJ adjustment for secondary analysis. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42024584308). Findings Eight RCTs involving 804 participants were included. Six studies (n = 746) showed that NBHO improved functional independence (RR 1.28, HKSJ 95% CI 1.07–1.51; P = 0.015), reduced disability (cOR 1.72, HKSJ 95% CI 1.35–2.20; P =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 804 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free