Evidence Hub

Azithromycin sequential therapy plus inhaled terbutaline for Mycoplasma Pneumoniae pneumonia in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yongcheng Sheng, Yi Liang, Chongyang Zhao, Deying Kang, Xue-Ting Liu

BMC Infectious Diseases, 2024

1,938 participants · 10 citations

Abstract

Background An improper host immune response to Mycoplasma pneumoniae generates excessive inflammation, which leads to the impairment of pulmonary ventilation function (PVF). Azithromycin plus inhaled terbutaline has been used in the treatment of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (MPP) in children with impaired pulmonary function, but previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed inconsistent efficacy and safety. This study is aimed to firstly provide a systematic review of the combined therapy. Methods This study was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO CRD42023452139). A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Six English and four Chinese databases were comprehensively searched up to June, 2023. RCTs of azithromycin sequential therapy plus inhaled terbutaline were selected. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB2) was used to evaluate the methodological quality of all studies, and meta-analysis was performed using Stata 15.0 with planned subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Publication bias was evaluated by a funnel plot and the Harbord’ test. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation recommendations. Results A total of 1,938 pediatric patients from 20 RCTs were eventually included. The results of meta-analysis showed that combined therapy was able to significantly increase total effectiveness rate (RR…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,938 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free