Evidence Hub

Resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii Complex Clinical Isolates to Sulbactam-Durlobactam: A Systematic Review of Data from In Vitro Studies

Falagas ME, Romanos LT, Ragias D, Filippou C

Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2025

3 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Due to the limited therapeutic options for patients with Acinetobacter baumannii complex infections, a new combination antimicrobial agent, sulbactam-durlobactam, has been developed. In this systematic review, we evaluated the available data on the resistance of A. baumannii complex clinical isolates to sulbactam-durlobactam.

Methods: We performed a thorough search of four databases for relevant studies. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) sulbactam-durlobactam breakpoint for A. baumannii complex susceptibility was used (MIC value ≤4 mg/L). Data on the presence of genes of various β-lactamases were also analyzed.

Results: From 182 identified articles, 84 were thoroughly screened. Data extraction was performed on 20 articles (published 2017-2025) reporting on a total of 10,412 A. baumannii complex clinical isolates. Among the various β-lactamases genes present, the OXA subvariants OXA-23/OXA-23-like were the most common (in 561 isolates). The proportions of non-selected (consecutive) A. baumannii isolates found to be resistant to sulbactam-durlobactam were 1.2%, 1.2%, and 4.6% in the three studies, and with non-susceptibility (resistance and intermediate resistance) were 2%, 2.1%, and 4.6% in three other studies. Non-susceptibility was very rare among A. calcoaceticus, A. nosocomialis, and A. pittii isolates (0%, 0.3%, and 0.6%, respectively). The proportion of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates with resistance was 0-5.2%. The…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free