Evidence Hub

A systematic review of efficacy and safety of newer drugs approved from 2016 to 2023 for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections

Sivanandy P, Manirajan P, Wen Qi O, Teng Khai O, Chun Wei O, Wei Ying N, Wadingasafi NAN, Azhar NA et al.

Annals of medicine, 2024

13 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background: Complicated urinary tract infections are a significant cause of morbidity, hospitalization, and elevated hospital costs associated with kidney transplantations. The treatment of complicated urinary tract infections is very challenging, due to varying severities of infection and lower cure rates. The available drug options for treating these infections are limited, each with different mechanisms of action, efficacy, and safety profiles, making drug selection more difficult for healthcare professionals. Objectives: A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of drugs approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections between 2016 and 2023. The primary endpoint for all drugs used in treating complicated urinary tract infections was the cure rate. Results: Among the drugs used for treating complicated urinary tract infections, meropenem had the highest cure rate at 91.4%, followed by plazomicin at 88% and cefiderocol at 73% when used as monotherapy. In combination therapy, meropenem-vaborbactam had the highest cure rate at 98.4%, followed by piperacillin-tazobactam at 94%, and ceftazidime-avibactam at 87.5%. The safety profiles of the drugs indicated that almost all drugs caused gastrointestinal symptoms, with imipenem-relebactam and colistin-imipenem combinations having the most serious adverse events. Cefiderocol had a low magnitude of adverse events, with most side…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free