Evidence Hub

Resistance of Gram-Negative Bacteria to Eravacycline: A Systematic Review of Data from In Vitro Studies

Falagas ME, Romanos LT, Kontogiannis DS, Filippou C, Karageorgopoulos DE

Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2025

11 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Eravacycline is a new fluorocycline antibiotic with a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity approved for the treatment of patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the published data on the resistance of Gram-negative bacterial isolates to eravacycline.

Methods: We identified relevant publications by systematically searching Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from their inception to 29 August 2025. Published antimicrobial resistance breakpoints of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were used.

Results: Data on 59,922 Gram-negative bacterial clinical isolates were retrieved from 68 articles after the screening of 283 potentially relevant studies. The resistance of consecutive (non-selected) Escherichia coli ranged from 0.9% to 9.6%. The MIC50 values of eravacycline were ≤0.5 mg/L for Acinetobacter baumannii isolates, including carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii, in the majority of studies. The proportions of resistance were higher among other lactose non-fermenting Gram-negative bacterial isolates, especially Pseudomonas aeruginosa, as well as among selected E. coli with advanced patterns of antimicrobial resistance.

Conclusions: The evaluated data support the adequate antimicrobial activity of eravacycline against most Gram-negative bacterial clinical isolates. However, in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free