Evidence Hub

Efficacy of Ruxolitinib with corticosteroids in idiopathic pneumonia syndrome post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A single-center experience and systematic review

M. Shahzad, Muhammad Atif Khan, M. Amin, Z. Sarfraz, Fizza Zulfiqar, H. Qasim, S. G. Chaudhary, Iqra Anwar et al.

Transplant Immunology, 2024

2 citations

Abstract

Background: Idiopathic Pneumonia Syndrome (IPS) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a life-threatening complication with high morbidity and mortality. This study evaluates the effectiveness of Ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor that modulates the immune response, in combination with corticosteroids (CS), which have anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects, in managing IPS after allo-HSCT.

Methods: The study includes a retrospective case series of three patients treated for IPS with Ruxolitinib and CS from the University of Kansas Medical Center and a systematic review of seven studies involving 346 cases, including our case series. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS.

Results: The case series included three patients with IPS after allo-HSCT who received ruxolitinib and CS. Patient A was a 72-year-old man with a history of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1), underwent allo-HSCT with a haploidentical donor with Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide, and Total Body Irradiation (Flu/Cy/TBI) reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) and Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide (PTCy), Tacrolimus (Tac) and Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) for GVHD prophylaxis, who developed five months after the transplant. Patient B was a 30-year-old man with a history of chemotherapy-refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with CR1 after Brexucabtagene autoleucel chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy who underwent…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free