Evidence Hub

Efficacy of inhaled antibiotics in children with ventilator-associated pneumonia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Sher W. Chee, R. Zaki, S. Y. Hng, K. Eg, Qiao Y. Lee, J. D. de Bruyne, Anne M Nathan

The Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 2026

346 participants

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The nebulization of antibiotics allows the delivery of high concentration of medication to the lungs without the systemic side-effects. Aims We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of inhaled antibiotics in children with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Data sources We searched Web of Science, SCOPUS, MEDLINE Complete, CINAHL and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registry until June 2025. This study was registered (CRD42024504982). Study selection We included studies published in the last ten years that recruited children under 18 years old with VAP and treated with inhaled antibiotics. We excluded studies of children with tracheostomy and bronchiectasis. Data extraction Type of intervention (inhaled ± intravenous (IV) antibiotics), clinical improvement, duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and hospitalization, bacterial eradication, and adverse events were recorded. Results Seven articles (346 patients) reported the use of inhaled antibiotics in VAP, of which four were randomized controlled trials. These studies included premature infants, neonates and children. The commonest inhaled antibiotic used was colistin (six studies). Meta-analysis revealed that inhaled antibiotics + IV antibiotics versus IV antibiotics +/− inhaled normal saline(placebo) resulted in no significant reduction in duration of MV (MD 0.88 days, 95% CI −2.72, 4.49; p=0.63, I2 = 85%) and ICU stay (MD 0.34[−2.79,3.40]; p=0.83, I2 =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 346 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free