Evidence Hub

Efficacy of higher-dose versus lower-dose corticosteroids in community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Yi-Kang Ouyang, Jia Lai, Peng Wang, Xiang Yuan, Hong-Bo Wang, Zi-Yan Xiang, Yan-Lin Xiao, Jia-Ling He et al.

Critical Care, 2026

9,746 participants

Abstract

Adjunctive corticosteroids improve outcomes in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), but whether higher-dose regimens provide additional benefit over lower-dose regimens remains uncertain. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to January 25, 2026. Interventions were standardized to protocol-assigned dexamethasone-equivalent doses: high (≥ 7.5 mg/d) and low (< 7.5 mg/d). A frequentist network meta-analysis was performed. The primary outcome was short-term all-cause mortality. Confidence in network meta-analysis estimates was assessed using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) framework. 32 RCTs involving 9,746 participants were included. Compared with placebo or usual care, higher-dose corticosteroids were associated with lower short-term mortality (Risk Ratio [RR], 0.83; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.74–0.92), as were lower-dose corticosteroids (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75–0.95). The indirect comparison showed no clear difference between higher- and lower-dose regimens (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.83–1.16). In severe patients with CAP, the corresponding indirect estimate was RR 1.01 (95% CI, 0.77–1.33). Most secondary active-dose comparisons were imprecise and showed no consistent advantage of either strategy. Compared with placebo or usual care, lower-dose corticosteroids (moderate confidence) and higher-dose corticosteroids (low confidence) were both associated with lower short-term…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 9,746 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free