Evidence Hub

The effects of levofloxacin on ECG parameters and late potentials

Basyigit I, Kahraman G, Ilgazli A, Yildiz F, Boyaci H

American journal of therapeutics, 2005

14 participants

Abstract

In this study, our aim was to investigate the proarrhythmic effects of levofloxacin. Twenty-six patients who were diagnosed as having community-acquired pneumonia were enrolled in the study. Intravenous levofloxacin, 500 mg daily, was given, and 12-lead ECG measurements were obtained before the infusion, at 30 and 60 minutes during infusion, and 10 minutes after its cessation. Resting late potentials were recorded before and after infusion. Twelve female and 14 male patients were participated the study. Mean age was 51.3 +/- 22.3 years. Levofloxacin infusion increased the heart rate (HR) and prolonged the corrected QT (QTc) intervals significantly (baseline HR: 84.6 +/- 18.8 vs. HR at 60 minutes: 88.6 +/- 18, P = 0.02; baseline QTc: 413.5 +/- 36.9 milliseconds vs. QTc at 60 minutes: 426.1 +/- 34.7, P = 0,006). There was no significant difference between the late potential values obtained before and after infusion. None of our patients experienced severe arrhythmia that required stopping the treatment. A single dose of IV levofloxacin prolongs the QTc interval without significant change in late potentials. Monitoring ECG during levofloxacin infusion might be necessary in patients who have a condition that could affect the QTc interval.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 14 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free