Evidence Hub

Intrapatient comparison of atrial and ventricular sensing, pacing threshold, and impedance: benefits with steroid-eluting leads

Moracchini PV, Tesorieri MC, Giuliani M, Alfano G, de Seta F, Boschi S

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE, 1996

58 participants

Abstract

We compared the atrial and ventricular bio-electrical effects relating to pacing threshold, pacing impedance, and pacing energy in each of 58 patients to determine the importance of pacing impedance in safe low energy stimulations. The study was conducted during 4 years of follow-up. Of the 58 patients in our study, 31 were stimulated in both chambers with steroid-eluting leads (Capsure 4503 and 4003) and 27 with platinum electrode catheters (Target Tip 4511 and 4011). The two groups were homogeneous in sex, age, cardiopathy, and reason for implant. At 6 months, the mean impedance values for the Target Tip were: 358 +/- 72 omega for the atrium and 443 +/- 72 omega for the ventricle (P < 0.00002); after 1 year, atrium = 386 +/- 77 omega, ventricle = 439 +/- 42 omega (P < 0.04); at 2 years, atrium = 409 +/- 86 omega, ventricle = 510 +/- 94 omega (P < 0.0001); at 3 years, atrium = 428 +/- 81 omega, ventricle = 494 +/- 67 omega (P < 0.02); and at 4 years, atrium = 424 +/- 71 omega and ventricle = 501 +/- 69 omega (P < 0.003). The mean impedance value (for the Capsure) was: atrium = 351 +/- 43 omega, ventricle = 431 +/- 81 omega at 6 months (P < 0.03); at 1 year, atrium = 359 +/- 38 omega, ventricle = 446 +/- 83 omega (P < 0.01); at 2 years, atrium = 304 +/- 124 omega, ventricle = 459 +/- 108 omega (P < 0.0003); at 3 years, atrium = 359 +/- 108 omega, ventricle = 461 +/- 89 omega (P < 0.02); and at 4 years, atrium = 419 +/- 133 omega and ventricle = 515 +/- 75 omega (P < 0.01).…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 58 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free