Evidence Hub

Pilot Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Tolerance and Safety of VITAL AF (Semi Elemental, High Protein, High Omega 3 Fat Enteral Formula) Versus Osmolite 1.2 (High Protein Enteral Formula) in Multiple ICU Settings (Medical, Surgical, Cardiothoracic)

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2014

50 participants

Abstract

The purpose of this pilot study is to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerance profile of the enteral feeding product VITAL AF (a semi-elemental, high protein, and high omega-3 fish oil) when compared to Osmolite 1.2, a standard feeding product in critically ill and/or post surgical patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). If enough patients are recruited, inferences about impact on outcomes may also be drawn.

Conditions: Critical Illness, Enteral Feeding.

Primary outcome: Improved tolerance to enteral (tube) feeding.

Enrollment: 50 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 50 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free