Evidence Hub

n-3 fatty acids and cardiovascular disease: the story is not over yet

Bilato C

Aging clinical and experimental research, 2013

Abstract

A large body of evidences suggest a beneficial role of n-3 poly-unsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) on cardiovascular disease, but recent observations and meta-analyses have raised doubts on their real efficacy. Many of these analyses, however, should be interpreted with caution, because of methodological shortcomings, heterogeneity of population, variability of drug dose and composition and other interpretation issues, and are not able to convincingly confute the results of the major clinical trials. Indeed, they demonstrated the efficacy of n-3 PUFAs at least in particular subset of individuals, such as post-acute myocardial infarction patients, at high risk of ventricular arrhythmias. The utilization of n-3 poly-unsaturated fatty acids in the current clinical practice should not be withheld, yet.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free