Evidence Hub

Does omega-3 PUFAs supplementation improve metabolic syndrome and related cardiovascular diseases? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Wang Y, Wang Y, Shehzad Q, Su Y, Xu L, Yu L, Zeng W, Fang Z et al.

Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, 2024

8,489 participants · 64 citations

Abstract

Abstract Literature is inconsistent regarding the effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (omega-3 PUFAs) supplementation on patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS) and related cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to summarize data from available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effect of omega-3 PUFAs on lipid profiles, blood pressure, and inflammatory markers. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify the relevant RCTs until 1 November 2022. Weighed mean difference (WMD) was combined using a random-effects model. Standard methods were applied to assess publication bias, sensitivity analysis, and heterogeneity among included studies. A total of 48 RCTs involving 8,489 subjects met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis demonstrated that omega-3 PUFAs supplementation significantly reduced triglyceride (TG) (WMD: −18.18 mg/dl; 95% CI: −25.41, −10.95; p < 0.001), total cholesterol (TC) (WMD: −3.38 mg/dl; 95% CI: −5.97, −0.79; p = 0.01), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (WMD: −3.52 mmHg; 95% CI: −5.69, −1.35; p = 0.001), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (WMD: −1.70 mmHg; 95% CI: −2.88, −0.51; p = 0.005), interleukin-6 (IL-6) (WMD: −0.64 pg/ml; 95% CI: −1.04, −0.25; p = 0.001), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (WMD: −0.58 pg/ml; 95% CI: −0.96, −0.19; p = 0.004), C-reactive protein (CRP) (WMD: −0.32 mg/l; 95% CI: −0.50, −0.14; p < 0.001), and interleukin-1 (IL-1)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 8,489 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free