Evidence Hub

Effect and safety of nutritional supplements on clinical outcomes in patients with acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Su K, Duan R, Wu Y

Nutrition journal, 2026

1,313 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of nutritional supplements is controversial compared to standard supplementation in the clinical management of individuals with acute pancreatitis (AP). We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare and rank their efficacy. METHODS: Four databases (Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, PubMed) were searched for randomized controlled trials. Random-effects models to derive outcome estimates, with risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) calculated for each comparison. The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) was used to rank the relative efficacy of all therapies. RESULTS: Seventeen trials including 1,313 patients were analyzed. ω-3 fatty acid supplementation emerged as the most effective intervention. It significantly shortened hospital stay (mean difference = -5.82 days; 95% CI -10.62 to -1.01) and intensive care unit (ICU) stay (mean difference = -6.09 days; 95% CI -8.98 to -3.20). It also reduced ICU stay in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) (mean difference = -6.09 days; 95% CI -8.98 to -3.02). Moreover, ω-3 fatty acids reduced the risk of sepsis (RR = 0.35; 95% CI 0.14–0.89) in AP and SAP (RR = 0.30; 95% CI 0.10–0.93). Synbiotics dramatically reduced the incidence of bacteremia (RR = 0.27; 95% CI = 0.09–0.86). It also reduced ICU stay with the enteral route (mean difference = -3.22 days; 95% CI, -3.95 to -2.49). However, none of the regimens produced significant improvements in mortality, infectious…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,313 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free