Evidence Hub

The Impact of Omega Fatty Acids on DKD: A Multimodal Study Integrating Mendelian Randomization, Proteomic Mediation Analysis, and Meta-Analysis

Zhang L, Wu M, Pan T, Dong D, Xue S

FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2026

474 participants

Abstract

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD), a significant microvascular complication of diabetes, is escalating the global disease burden. Research suggests free fatty acids, particularly specific polyunsaturated fatty acids, may influence DKD development and progression through anti-inflammatory and antioxidant mechanisms. However, existing evidence remains controversial, and the precise underlying mechanisms are still unclear. We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis leveraging genome-wide association study data and plasma proteomic panels. A two-step protein-mediated MR framework and Reactome pathway enrichment were employed to identify mediators and elucidate biological pathways. Subsequently, we conducted a meta-analysis of clinical studies to comprehensively evaluate the impact of omega-3 supplementation on DKD patients. Genetically predicted higher plasma omega-3 fatty acid levels were causally associated with reduced DKD risk (odds ratio [OR] = 0.869, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.772-0.978, p = 0.020), while omega-6 fatty acids showed no significant causal association (OR = 0.895, 95% CI: 0.731-1.096, p = 0.283). Fourteen plasma proteins showed nominally significant evidence of partial mediation, with consistent mediation directions and mediation proportions ranging from 2.10% to 29.80%. Potential mediators included neuronal pentraxin-2, hemoglobin subunit theta-1, and periostin. Enrichment analysis highlighted Notch signaling, apoptosis regulation, and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 474 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free