Evidence Hub

Hypoalbuminemia and reduced sputum microbiome diversity associated with antibiotic treatment failure in nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia

Hosogaya N, Fukui S, Takazono T, Fukushima K, Morio R, Irifune S, Morimoto S, Nakada N et al.

Drug discoveries & therapeutics, 2026

56 participants

Abstract

Nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia (NHCAP) pose significant challenges in older populations, yet factors predicting antibiotic treatment failure remain elusive. This exploratory secondary analysis of a multicenter phase IV trial aimed to identify the clinical and microbiome predictors of treatment failure in patients with NHCAP treated with lascufloxacin. Among the 56 evaluable patients (median age 86 years; cured n = 44, not cured n = 12), paired sputum and tongue samples were analyzed using 16S ribosomal RNA gene clone library sequencing. Alpha diversity was assessed using the Shannon index, Simpson index, observed richness, and Pielou's evenness, whereas beta diversity was calculated using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity and visualized by principal coordinate analysis. Serum albumin was significantly lower in not cured patients (3.0 vs. 3.5 g/dL, p = 0.0497) and emerged as the strongest predictor of treatment failure in univariate logistic regression (odds ratio 0.18, 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.73, p = 0.016). Sputum Pielou's evenness showed a comparable predictive ability (odds ratio 0.010, p = 0.047). The overall microbiome community composition did not differ according to the outcome. Notably, patients with hypoalbuminemia (< 2.85 g/dL) exhibited significantly reduced sputum alpha diversity (Shannon p = 0.034, Simpson p = 0.025, Pielou's evenness p = 0.010). A simple risk stratification combining hypoalbuminemia and denture use identified a high-risk subgroup…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 56 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free