Evidence Hub

Prevalence of circulating hepatitis C virus genotypes and drug-resistant variants in former Soviet Union countries: A scoping review with genotype meta-analysis

Immanuel OM, Fabiyi OT, Issabekova Z, Oshakbayev KP, Abuova G, Konysbekova A, Vattipally SB, Bajpai R et al.

International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases, 2026

329 participants

Abstract

Background: Despite high hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence in the Former Soviet Union (FSU), data on genotype distribution and resistance-associated substitutions (RAS) remain fragmented. This study aims to map the breadth of molecular epidemiological evidence on HCV genotypes and resistance in FSU.

Method: We performed a scoping review with a genotype meta-analysis of 24 cross-sectional studies published in PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from 1990 to 2025. The systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251140060).

Results: The pooled prevalence of the major HCV genotypes (G1, G2, and G3) was 98.02% (95% CI: 96.71-98.94%), with G1 having the highest prevalence (59%), followed by G3 (27%). G1 was highest in the Mixed Region (73.5%) and lowest in the South Caucasus (30.6%), G2 was highest in the Southern Caucasus (16.8%), and G3 was highest in Eastern Europe (34.5%). Crucially, baseline RAS data were severely limited, with only four small studies (n = 329) from Russia and Georgia reporting clinically significant RAS (NS5A-A30K, Y93H).

Conclusion: This study confirms G1 and G3 as the predominant circulating HCV genotypes in the FSU and highlights the near absence of data on RAS. Achieving HCV elimination in this region depends on both strengthening the care cascade and implementing robust virological surveillance systems.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 329 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free