Evidence Hub

Negative impact of omega-3 egg enrichment on egg weight and egg production: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Kinchin GJ, Vieira DS, Conceição MF, Pereira RQF, Filho LPS, Vieira BS

Research in veterinary science, 2026

3,423 participants

Abstract

Omega-3 egg enrichment is based on hens` feed supplementation with different omega-3 sources. Although contradictory, negative effects of this strategy have been described on hens` productive performance. This study aimed to summarize literature information through systematic review and meta-analysis to accurately quantify the effect size of omega-3 supplementation on egg omega-3 concentration, egg weight, egg production and hens` feed conversion. Literature search retrieved 1835 results, but only 17 met our eligibility criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. Total assessed population of hens (n = 3423) was composed mainly of brown hens/eggs (n = 1758), from South American trials (n = 1254), receiving omega-3 from flaxseed (n = 548), fish oil (n = 588), microalgae (n = 794) and mixed animal/plant sources (n = 944). Overall, omega-3 supplementation increased (p < 0.001) egg omega-3 concentration, but decreased egg weight (p = 0.007) by 0.45 g and egg production (p = 0.040) by 0.88%. While omega-3 source and feed concentration were significant moderators for nearly all variables, egg weight was reduced after omega-3 supplementation regardless of trial location, hens` genetics, supplementation start and period, omega-3 source and feed omega-3 concentration. Flaxseed was the most effective (p < 0.001) source in transferring omega-3 from feed to eggs, but it was also the one that most reduced (p < 0.001) egg production. In conclusion, feed omega-3 supplementation…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 3,423 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free