Evidence Hub

Yinma Jiedu granules combined with antibacterial drugs for patients with community-acquired pneumonia: protocol for a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-parallel controlled clinical trial

Yue-Wei Li, Jingmin Xiao, Feiting Fan, Luo-Qi Lin, Yi-He Chi, Xin-Yuan Tan, Wen-Hang Zhao, Weiliang Wang et al.

Frontiers in Medicine, 2025

226 participants

Abstract

Background Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a severe respiratory infection that can lead to a range of health issues. Yinma Jiedu (YMJD) granules, a representative classic traditional Chinese patent medicine, are widely used in China, yet high-quality evidence regarding their efficacy in alleviating clinical symptoms remains limited. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of YMJD granules for the treatment of CAP. Methods This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel clinical trial will be conducted at 11 hospitals in China, with each center enrolling patients competitively. A total of 226 CAP patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be stratified by age and then randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention group (n = 113; YMJD granules) or control group (n = 113; YMJD placebo). All patients will receive a 7-day treatment course followed by a 7-day follow-up for assessment. The primary outcome is the clinical symptom improvement rate on day 4. Secondary outcomes include the clinical cure rate, the improvement rate of individual symptoms, the Cough and Sputum Assessment Questionnaire, the improved pneumonia imaging absorption evaluation scale, the CURB-65 score, the dosage and course of antibiotics, the changes in inflammatory markers, Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) syndrome scores and the amount of emergency drug used. Adverse events will also be assessed. Subgroup analyses will explore heterogeneity in YMJD treatment…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 226 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free