Evidence Hub

Meta-Analysis of Bioaccessibility of Hydrophobic Compounds in Buttermilk Matrices: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Synthesis

Sagandyk A, Tultabayeva T, Zhakupova G, Makangali K, Muldasheva A, Shoman A, Dairova K

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026

Abstract

Hydrophobic bioactive compounds, such as curcuminoids, β-carotene and long-chain lipids, as well as amphiphilic structural lipids (milk fat globule membrane (MFGM)-associated phospholipids), often exhibit low bioaccessibility due to poor aqueous solubility and/or susceptibility to degradation, which limits their effective use in functional foods. Buttermilk, a dairy byproduct enriched with proteins, lipids and MFGM components, provides a structurally complex, amphiphilic matrix that can enhance micellar solubilization, protect hydrophobic and amphiphilic compounds during digestion and thereby modulate their potential bioavailability. This systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, synthesizes quantitative data from in vitro gastrointestinal digestion studies to evaluate the impact of buttermilk and related matrices (e.g., buttermilk yogurt, ultrafiltered buttermilk, and composite nanosystems) on the bioaccessibility of hydrophobic compounds and MFGM phospholipids compared with aqueous or non-buttermilk controls. We identified a limited but growing body of in vitro evidence indicating that buttermilk-based matrices generally increase the intestinal bioaccessibility of curcuminoids, β-carotene, omega-3 fatty acids, vitamin and MFGM phospholipids relative to non-buttermilk systems, with particularly pronounced effects in structured emulsions, yogurts, ultrafiltered buttermilk and MFGM-enriched nanosystems. Rather…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free