Evidence Hub

Genetic variants associated with triglyceride metabolism and fasting triglyceride concentrations: a systematic review and a meta-analysis

Nuwaylati DA, Mensink RP, Joris PJ, Coort SLM, Plat J

Journal of clinical lipidology, 2026

Abstract

Background and objective: The genetic background of hypertriglyceridemia is complex. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we determined genetic variants associated with fasting triglyceride (TG) and very-low-density lipoprotein-TG (VLDL-TG) concentrations in European adults.

Methods: We searched PubMed and the National Human Genome Research Institute-European Bioinformatics Institute (NHGRI-EBI) genome-wide association studies catalog for studies on genetic variants associated with fasting TG and VLDL-TG concentrations. We performed the meta-analysis on 23 variants from studies that met our criteria. A fixed-effects model was applied, with a random-effects model used when significant heterogeneity was detected. The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor was used to annotate these variants.

Results: Overall, 157 studies were included, of which 130 were used for meta-analysis. Overall, 1837 variants were related to fasting TG and/or VLDL-TG (P ≤ 0.05). Our meta-analysis revealed 11 genetic variants associated with fasting TG: rs58542926 in the transmembrane 6 superfamily member 2 (TM6SF2) gene, rs738409 in the patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3 (PNPLA3) gene, rs7903146 in the transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) gene, rs320 and rs328 in the lipoprotein lipase (LPL) gene, and rs1801282 in the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ2 (PPARγ2) gene were associated with lower TG concentrations, while rs693 in the apolipoprotein-B (APOB) gene, rs5128 in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free