Evidence Hub

Risk factors for allergic rhinitis in children: an umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis

Dou Y, Li J, Qiu X, Wu P, Wang Y, Chen M, Cui Z, Luo F et al.

Frontiers in immunology, 2026

Abstract

Background: This study evaluates the quality of study design, potential biases, and evidence strength for childhood risk factors associated with allergic rhinitis (AR), while summarizing the key identified factors.

Methods: The protocol for this review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251248436). Relevant literature was systematically retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, covering the period from inception to May 2025. Methodological quality and evidence certainty were independently evaluated using AMSTAR and GRADE.

Results: This review identified 75 risk factors: 22 were linked to a higher risk of AR in children, 7 were protective, and 46 showed insufficient evidence to determine an association. Overall, evidence quality was low or very low, with only one factor supported by moderate-quality evidence. Key findings indicate that early-life antibiotic use, cesarean section, smoking during pregnancy, air pollution, ADHD diagnosis, ASD diagnosis, Kawasaki disease and maternal OCP exposure were associated with higher risk, while pet exposure, raw milk and fish consumption, birth order ≥ 2, and number of siblings ≥ 2 are associated with reduced risk.

Conclusion: This first umbrella review systematically compiles all available meta-analytic data on pediatric AR risk factors, offering a provisional evidence map that prioritizes candidate modifiable targets for future research. Earlylife food sensitization is the only factor…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free