Evidence Hub

Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Samankan S, Gharekhani A, Khiali S, Rezagholizadeh A, Agabalazadeha A, Sarbakhsh P, Alizadeh L, Sharifi A et al.

Clinical nutrition ESPEN, 2025

1,020 participants

Abstract

Background: Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids are known for anti-inflammatory and cardiovascular benefits, but their impact on solid organ transplant outcomes is unclear.

Objectives: To assess the effects of omega-3 supplementation on clinical outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through May 2025. Eligible studies were evaluated for transplant-related outcomes, with the primary outcome being graft rejection at 30-day, 3-month, and 1-year post-transplant. Secondary outcomes included changes in lipid profile, blood pressure, renal function, and infection rates.

Results: Sixteen trials involving 1,020 patients were included. Omega-3 supplementation did not result in a statistically significant reduction in rejection rates at 30 days, 3 months, or 1 year post-transplant. Diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly (Hedges' g = -0.72; 95 % CI: -1.31 to -0.13), and total cholesterol levels also declined (Hedges' g = -0.64; 95 % CI: -1.04 to -0.24), particularly in kidney transplant recipients. In heart transplant recipients, systolic blood pressure decreased significantly (Hedges' g = -1.03; 95 % confidence interval: -1.53 to -0.54). Effects on high- and low-density lipoproteins, triglycerides, glomerular filtration rate, and creatinine clearance were inconsistent and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,020 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free