Evidence Hub

Impact of disease-modifying therapies on imaging parameters in cardiac amyloidosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Briasoulis A, Georgiopoulos G, Kourek C, Patras R, Lama N, Theodorakakou F, Tepetes N, Zervas G et al.

Current problems in cardiology, 2026

Abstract

Transthyretin-mediated (ATTR) and immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) cardiac amyloidosis causes progressive myocardial dysfunction and poor prognosis. Disease-specific therapies in ATTR and anti-clonal therapies in AL cardiac amyloidosis may modify disease, but treatment-induced changes in prognostic cardiac imaging markers remain incompletely defined. We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, and EMBASE for studies reporting treatment-associated changes in global longitudinal strain (GLS), left ventricular (LV) wall thickness, and extracellular volume (ECV) assessed by echocardiography or cardiac magnetic resonance. Random-effects meta-analyses pooled mean changes. Seventeen studies met inclusion criteria. In ATTR cardiac amyloidosis, therapy with silencers or RNA-depleting agents was associated with improved GLS (pooled mean difference [MD] -0.97 %, 95 % CI -1.27 to -0.68) and reduced LV wall thickness (MD -0.72 mm, 95 % CI -1.26 to -0.17) versus no therapy, while ECV showed no significant change (MD -1.93 %, 95 % CI -15.27 to 11.41). In AL amyloidosis, complete hematologic response was linked to greater improvement than non-response in GLS (MD -1.19 %, 95 % CI -2.20 to -0.17) and LV wall thickness (MD -0.87 mm, 95 % CI -1.31 to -0.43). NMA in ATTR cardiac amyloidosis showed that patisiran (MD -1.04 %, 95 % CI -1.56 to -0.52), tafamidis (-0.91 %, -1.40 to -0.41), and vutrisiran (-0.90 %, -1.75 to -0.05) improved GLS versus placebo, compared to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free