Evidence Hub

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Commercial Oral Supplements for Hair Growth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Alanazi R, Alshammari S, Aldossari K, Alwatban R, Aljeribah D, Alanazi S, Alsalhi A, Alhumam A et al.

Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2026

967 participants

Abstract

Background: Hair loss is a common condition affecting both men and women, with significant psychosocial impact. While oral supplements are marketed to improve hair growth, their clinical efficacy remains debated. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of commercial oral nutraceuticals for hair growth.

Methods: For this systematic review, a comprehensive search was undertaken in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), open-label trials, and proof-of-concept studies evaluating oral supplements in adults (≥ 18 years) with alopecia or hair thinning. Primary outcomes included objective measures including hair counts, density, growth rate, tensile strength, and pull test. Secondary outcomes were investigator/patient assessments and adverse events.

Results: A total of 14 studies, including 967 participants, were included. Supplements assessed included Ceramosides, Nutrafol, Nourkrin, Lambdapil, Viviscal, Forti5, GFM oral supplement, and Cynatine HNS. Most trials were RCTs with durations of 12 weeks to 12 months. Meta-analysis demonstrated significant improvements with oral supplements versus placebo: reduced telogen hair density (mean difference [MD] -5.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] -6.74 to -5.08, p < 0.00001), increased anagen hair density (MD 10.48, 95% CI: 8.81 to 12.14, p < 0.00001), and reduced telogen proportion (MD 3.08, 95% CI: -3.35 to -2.81, p < 0.00001).…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 967 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free