Evidence Hub

The role of lipid lowering medications in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Morsell B, Hamed M, Scwartz S, Martinez B, Roble K, Kahan J, Habib P

BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026

85,829 participants

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The mortality benefit of lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) in true primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains uncertain, in part because prior studies frequently included individuals with existing cardiovascular, vascular, or cerebrovascular disease. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of LLTs on all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events exclusively in patients without prior CVD. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE were searched through October 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LLTs with control therapy. STUDY SELECTION: RCTs assessing LLTs for primary prevention and reporting mortality or cardiovascular outcomes were included; trials with any participants with prior CVD, vascular disease, or cerebrovascular events were excluded. RESULTS: Ten RCTs including 85,829 participants, met criteria. LLTs did not reduce all-cause mortality compared with control (3.9% vs. 3.9%; RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.89–1.07) or cardiac mortality (1.4% vs. 1.5%; RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.82–1.04). However, LLTs—primarily statins—reduced MACE (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.68–0.84), myocardial infarction (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.57–0.72), revascularization (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.57–0.86), stroke/TIA (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57–0.98), and cardiovascular hospitalizations (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65–0.87). CONCLUSION: Among individuals without prior cardiovascular, vascular, or cerebrovascular disease, LLTs did not reduce all-cause or cardiovascular mortality but were associated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 85,829 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free