Evidence Hub

Effect of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on markers of inflammation and endothelial function in patients with chronic heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mohammed Ibrahim Mohialdeen Gubari

Cellular and Molecular Biology, 2024

853 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Chronic heart disease (CHD) is still a major global cause of morbidity and mortality, necessitating effective therapeutic interventions to mitigate its progression. Omega-3 fatty acids (FAs) have garnered attention for their potential anti-inflammatory and endothelial-protective properties in CHD management. The present study aims to assess the efficacy of Omega-3 FA supplementation on markers of inflammation and endothelial function in patients with CHD. To achieve this, we used the relevant keywords to search international databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus) and extract publications evaluating the effectiveness of omega-3 FA supplementation on inflammation markers and endothelial function in patients with CHD. STATA (version 15) and the random and fixed-effects models were used to evaluate the collected data. Thirteen clinical trial studies met inclusion criteria, with a total sample size of 853 individuals (406 cases and 447 controls). The cases had a mean age of 58 ± 10.3 years. The pooled results indicated that omega-3 Omega-3 FA supplementation significantly reduced the level of circulating IL-6 (SMD = -0.47, 95% CI -1.29 to 0.35, %, p < 0.001), hs-CRP (SMD = -0.21, 95% CI -0.70 to 0.28, p = 0.01), and TNF-α (SMD = -0.56, 95% CI -1.14 to 0.01, p < 0.001) in patients with CHD. Also, findings revealed that a daily supplement of omega-3 significantly increased FMD by 0.34% (95% CI: 0.14-0.54%, p < 0.001) as compared with placebo by a fixed-effect model…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 853 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free