Evidence Hub

The Impact of Citicoline/Phosphatidylserine Supplementation on Cognitive Performance and Executive Functions in Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials

Kucuksahin NG, Kaya TT, Halac E, Sut E, Ciray RO

Human psychopharmacology, 2026

Abstract

Introduction: Citicoline and phosphatidylserine (PS) have been proposed as potential neuroprotective and cognitive-enhancing agents; however, evidence of their therapeutic impact across populations with mental disorders remains limited. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of citicoline and PS, administered as monotherapy or adjunctive treatment, on cognitive performance in children, adolescents, and adults with mental disorders.

Methods: A systematic review of 11 included studies was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched were PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL through October 2025. Ten studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and one was a non-randomized controlled trial (non-RCT). Methodological quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools.

Results: Five studies focused on children with ADHD, and the remaining studies included adults with mood disorders, alcohol and substance use disorders, and schizophrenia. Regarding ADHD, PS-containing supplementation produced significant improvements in attention and impulsivity in three studies, whereas two studies found no significant differences. A single study in schizophrenia reported significant improvements in verbal free recall but no global cognitive gains. Results for alcohol and substance use disorders, as well as mood disorders were mixed. Two studies revealed selective benefits in cognitive performance, while the others…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free