Evidence Hub

Effects of enteral immunonutrition enriched with multiple immunonutrients on clinical outcomes of patients who underwent gastric cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chen M, Duan Y, He Y, Zhong S, Li Q, Zhao Y

Frontiers in medicine, 2026

1,653 participants

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of enteral immunonutrition (EIN) compared to standard enteral nutrition (EN) in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery.

Methods: We searched major databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to December 2025. Nineteen RCTs involving 1,653 patients were included. Outcomes assessed included infectious and total complications, length of hospital stay (LOS), gastrointestinal tolerance, and immune-inflammatory markers.

Results: Compared to EN, EIN significantly reduced the incidence of infectious complications (OR = 0.48), gastrointestinal intolerance, and total complications. It also shortened LOS (MD = -1.24 days) and time to first flatus. EIN improved immune parameters (increased IgG, IgM, IgA, transferrin) and reduced inflammatory markers (WBC, CRP). Subgroup analysis indicated that perioperative administration yielded the most significant benefits, while preoperative-only intervention lacked sufficient evidence. Intervention durations > 7 days showed superior outcomes, with regimens within 10 days offering an optimal balance of efficacy and feasibility.

Conclusion: Perioperative enteral immunonutrition, particularly when administered for 7-10 days, is associated with reduced postoperative complications, improved humoral immunity, and shorter hospital stay in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery. Given the moderate certainty of evidence for primary outcomes, the low certainty for several secondary…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,653 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free