Evidence Hub

Effectiveness of Yinhua Pinggan granules in community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial

Jiao‐li Wang, Hao Hu, Yi-Lei Guo, Jin Han, Hai-Tong Wan, Y. Tong, Man Luo, Xian-Wen Li

Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2025

240 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Ethnopharmacological relevance Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is an acute inflammation of the alveoli and distal bronchi caused by bacterial, viral, or other pathogenic microbial infections. Yinhua Pinggan (YHPG) granules have demonstrated anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and antiviral effects, suggesting their potential as a treatment option for CAP. Aim To assess the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), YHPG granules, in combination with conventional pneumonia treatments. Materials and methods This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted at a medical center in Hangzhou and involved 240 eligible participants. In addition to conventional pneumonia treatment, participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either YHPG granules or placebo for 10 days. The primary outcome measure was the difference in pneumonia cure rates at the end of treatment. Secondary outcomes included chest CT absorption rate, criticality score (SMART-COP score), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, lactate (LC) level, procalcitonin (PCT) level, time for symptom recovery, length of hospital stay, and TCM syndrome scores. Results In total, 229 participants were included in the analysis. The pneumonia cure rate in the YHPG granule group was higher than that in the placebo group (37.2% vs. 22.4%, mean difference: 14.75%, 95% CI: 3.05–26.46, p 0.05). Notably, the use of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 240 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free