Evidence Hub

Symptom relief and cytokine modulation by clarithromycin in mild COVID-19 pneumonia: an exploratory, multicenter, randomized-controlled open-label trial (CAME-COVID study)

Kazuko Yamamoto, N. Iwanaga, Asuka Umemura, T. Sawai, Makoto Sumiyoshi, K. Hashiguchi, Yusuke Mori, H. Ishii et al.

Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease, 2026

56 participants

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains an epidemic worldwide, and long COVID is a major social concern. Therapeutic options for relieving symptoms of COVID-19 pneumonia are limited. Clarithromycin (CAM), a macrolide antimicrobial, also functions as an immunomodulator. Objectives: To assess the efficacy of CAM in improving clinical symptoms and attenuating inflammation in patients with mild COVID-19, with the aim of preventing progression to severe disease. Design: An exploratory, multicenter, randomized-controlled, open-label trial. Methods: This trial enrolled patients with mild COVID-19 pneumonia without oxygen supplementation from May 2021 through February 2022 in eight hospitals in Japan. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to groups A (CAM 800 mg/day, 7 days), B (CAM 400 mg/day, 7 days), or C (standard treatment). The primary endpoint was the number of days required for 50% improvement in seven symptoms (fatigue, headache, cough, shortness of breath, taste/smell disturbance, and general unwellness) based on severity scores. Secondary endpoints included inflammatory cytokines, viral load, immunoglobulins, and pneumonia infiltrations. Results: A total of 56 patients were enrolled and randomized. The primary endpoint did not differ significantly between groups (A: 5.0 days, B: 4.0 days, C: 4.0 days), though the seven symptoms tended to disappear earlier in group A than group C (p = 0.08), and fatigue significantly decreased in group A (p =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 56 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free