Evidence Hub

Performance of artificial intelligence models for monitoring psychological stress using noncontact physiological signals: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Han X, Wang Q, Gao L, Cao H

Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026

Abstract

Background: Psychological stress is a common and dynamic mental health concern, but conventional assessment methods often rely on self-report questionnaires, clinical interviews, or contact-based physiological sensors, which may limit continuous and unobtrusive monitoring in everyday settings. Noncontact sensing technologies combined with artificial intelligence (AI) provide a potential approach for low-burden assessment by capturing physiological or physiology-related information without direct body contact.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of AI models using noncontact physiological signals for psychological stress recognition, summarize current sensing and modeling approaches, and identify methodological limitations affecting practical translation.

Methods: We searched PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, Embase, and APA PsycINFO from inception to May 6, 2026, and performed backward citation searching. Eligible studies used noncontact sensing modalities, including remote or imaging photoplethysmography, thermal imaging, or wireless radar, combined with machine learning or deep learning methods to identify psychological stress. Narrative synthesis was conducted for all included studies, and quantitative meta-analysis was performed for binary stress classification tasks.

Results: Twenty-one studies were included, most of which were conducted in laboratory or controlled settings. For binary stress classification, 8 studies…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free