Evidence Hub

Randomized, controlled trial comparing Rhodococcus equi and poly‐N ‐acetyl glucosamine hyperimmune plasma to prevent R equi pneumonia in foals

S. Kahn, C. Cywes-Bentley, G. Blodgett, N. M. Canaday, Carly E. Turner-Garcia, P. Flores-Ahlschwede, L. Metcalfe, M. Nevill et al.

Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 2021

5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Hyperimmune plasma raised against β‐1→6‐poly‐N‐acetyl glucosamine (PNAG HIP) mediates more opsonophagocytic killing of Rhodococcus equi (R equi) than does R equi hyperimmune plasma (RE HIP) in vitro. The relative efficacy of PNAG HIP and RE HIP to protect foals against R equi pneumonia, however, has not been evaluated. Hypothesis Transfusion with PNAG HIP will be superior to RE HIP in foals for protection against R equi pneumonia in a randomized, controlled, blinded clinical trial. Animals Four hundred sixty Quarter Horse and Thoroughbred foals at 5 large breeding farms in the United States. Methods A randomized, controlled, blinded clinical trial was conducted in which foals were transfused within 24 hours after birth with 2 L of either RE HIP or PNAG HIP. Study foals were monitored through weaning for clinical signs of pneumonia by farm veterinarians. The primary outcome was the proportion of foals that developed pneumonia after receiving each type of plasma. Results The proportion of foals that developed pneumonia was the same between foals transfused with RE HIP (14%; 32/228) and PNAG HIP (14%; 30/215). Conclusions and Clinical Importance Results indicate that PNAG HIP was not superior to a commercially available, United States Department of Agriculture‐licensed RE HIP product for protecting foals against R equi pneumonia under field conditions.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free