Evidence Hub

The effect and safety of corticosteroid treatment for severe community-acquired pneumonia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Yang Chen, Huanming Kuang, Youfeng Zhu, Xing Luo

Frontiers in Medicine, 2024

1,959 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Background There is ongoing debate on the efficacy and safety of corticosteroid therapy for severe community-acquired pneumonia (sCAP). Our aim was to investigate the safety and therapeutic effectiveness of corticosteroids in the sCAP therapy. Methods Electronic databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science and Embase) were searched from inception to January 10, 2024. We examined for randomized controlled studies assessing the effectiveness and safety of corticosteroid therapy in individuals with sCAP. The primary outcome was short-term mortality. Subgroup analyses were carried out according to the corticosteroid type. Additionally, trial sequential analysis (TSA) was carried out. Results In total, 11 trials, including 1959 patients, met the predetermined standards and underwent analysis. Overall, our meta-analysis exhibited that corticosteroids may considerably lower short-term mortality when compared to control treatment [6 studies (1,582 patients); odds ratio (OR), 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49–0.88; p = 0.005] and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels [5 studies (359 patients); mean difference (MD), −6.97; 95% CI −12.33 to −1.60; p = 0.01], but TSA revealed that the sample size needs to be larger. Moreover, we observed that corticosteroids reduced the hospital length of stay [7 studies (999 patients); MD, −3.56; 95% CI, −4.28 to −2.84; p < 0.001], need for mechanical ventilation (MV) [7 studies (1,328 patients); OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.45–0.79; p = 0.001] and MV…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,959 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free