Evidence Hub

Epithelial healing and visual outcomes of patients using omega-3 oral nutritional supplements before and after photorefractive keratectomy: a pilot study

Ong NH, Purcell TL, Roch-Levecq AC, Wang D, Isidro MA, Bottos KM, Heichel CW, Schanzlin DJ

Cornea, 2013

9 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of omega-3 oral nutritional supplementation on corneal reepithelialization, visual acuity, and tear stability after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

METHODS: This is a prospective, randomized, single-blinded controlled therapeutic trial using omega-3 oral nutritional supplements (TheraTears Nutrition for Dry Eyes; Advanced Vision Research-Akorn, Ann Arbor, MI) conducted at our center. Eighteen healthy patients with refractive error between -1 and -8 diopters were recruited and had bilateral PRK. The treatment group (n = 9 subjects) received omega-3 2 weeks before surgery through 1 month after PRK. The control group (n = 9 subjects) was not given omega-3. Epithelial defects were photographed on postoperative days 0 to 5. Reepithelialization (area in square millimeters) was assessed by fluorescein staining until healing. Tear breakup time (TBUT) and uncorrected distance visual acuity were measured at 1 week, and 1 and 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS: Epithelial defect in the treatment group eyes healed faster compared with that of the controls (P = 0.04). The treatment group eyes healed at an average rate of 1.19% [SD = 0.002; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04%-1.34%] per hour, versus 0.83% (SD = 0.0008; 95% CI, 0.77%-0.89%) for controls (Mann-Whitney rank-sum test, P < 0.001). The treatment group eyes maintained a significantly longer TBUT from week 1 through 3 months (mean = 9.52 seconds, SD = 0.81; 95% CI, 8.93-10.10), compared with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 9 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free