Evidence Hub

Positive effects of folic acid supplementation on cognitive aging are dependent on ω-3 fatty acid status: a post hoc analysis of the FACIT trial

van Soest APM, van de Rest O, Witkamp RF, de Groot LCPGM

The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2021

791 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although epidemiological studies suggest a protective role of B vitamins and omega-3 (ω-3) fatty acids in cognitive decline, findings from intervention studies are conflicting. Mechanistic studies suggest that the ω-3 (n-3) fatty acid status can modulate the effects of B vitamins on cognitive decline.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the interaction between baseline ω-3 fatty acid statuses and folic acid treatment on cognitive decline in a placebo-controlled trial [FACIT (Folic Acid and Carotid Intima-media Thickness)].

METHODS: This post hoc analysis included 791 older adults aged 50-70 y with plasma total homocysteine ≥13 µmol/L and ≤26 µmol/L and serum vitamin B12 ≥200 pmol/L. Participants received 800 µg folic acid or placebo daily for 3 y. Global cognitive functioning and domain-specific functioning (episodic memory, information processing speed, executive functioning) were assessed at baseline and after 3 y. The effect of the folic acid supplementation was analyzed according to tertiles of baseline ω-3 fatty acid concentrations using linear multiple regression.

RESULTS: The mean ± SD age of the study population was 60.2 ± 5.6 y, and the mean ± SD Mini-Mental State Examination score was 28.6 ± 1.5. The treatment effect of folic acid was significantly larger in participants in the low compared to high ω-3 fatty acid tertile for global cognition (difference in z-score: mean ± SE = 0.16 ± 0.059; P < 0.01). Regarding domain-specific functioning, similar results were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 791 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free