Evidence Hub

A multicomponent intervention consisting of exercise, proteins and omega-3 supplementation to improve sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults: Lessons learned from a 5-armed randomized controlled feasibility trial

Amini N, Dupont J, Lapauw L, Vercauteren L, Peeters L, Dedeyne L, Verschueren S, Tournoy J et al.

The Journal of frailty & aging, 2026

13 participants

Abstract

Background: Anabolic interventions, including physical exercise, proteins and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) supplementation, have shown effectiveness in improving sarcopenia outcomes. However, data on their combined effects in older adults with sarcopenia remain limited.

Objectives: To assess feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of a multicomponent intervention combining individualized home-based exercise, proteins, and/or omega-3 supplementation.

Design: Parallel five-armed randomized assessor-blinded controlled feasibility trial with triple-blinded supplementation.

Participants and setting: Community-dwelling older adults (≥65 years) diagnosed with sarcopenia (EWGSOP2-criteria) from the Exercise and Nutrition for Healthy Ageing (ENHANce) study. The ENHANce study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03649698).

Intervention: Participants were randomized into 5 groups: 1) Exercise, 2) Proteins, 3) Exercise+Protein, 4) Exercise+Protein+Omega-3, and 5) Control group.

Measurements: Feasibility was assessed via eligibility, recruitment, retention, and data completion rates. Acceptability was evaluated through participants' feedback, adherence, and safety. Effects were measured by changes in sarcopenia outcomes after 12 weeks.

Results: Fifty-eight participants (76.2±6.6years,♀:65.5%) were included (Exercise,n=9;Protein,n=12; Exercise+Protein,n=13;Exercise+Protein+Omega-3;n=12;Control,n=12). Feasibility was low, with a recruitment rate of 2%.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 13 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free