Evidence Hub

Lascufloxacin switch therapy versus ampicillin/sulbactam for older patients with community-acquired pneumonia in Japan (STEP study): a study protocol for a multicentre open-label randomised controlled non-inferiority trial

Takeda K, Takazono T, Ashizawa N, Yoshida M, Ide S, Iwanaga N, Hirano K, Hosogaya N et al.

BMJ open, 2026

80 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in older adults in Japan. Prolonged hospitalisation accelerates functional decline, promotes the progression of frailty and increases the need for long-term care. An early switch from intravenous to oral antibiotics helps achieve clinical outcomes comparable to those of continued intravenous therapy while shortening hospital stays. For older adults with frailty, avoiding unnecessary hospitalisation may help prevent further deterioration of functional status. Demonstrating non-inferiority of oral antibiotics for clinical cure would help clinicians recommend the use of switch therapy to shorten hospital stay and improve functional outcomes in this high-risk population. This study aimed to evaluate the non-inferiority of lascufloxacin switch therapy to intravenous ampicillin/sulbactam in older adults with frailty and CAP.

Methods and analysis: This multicentre randomised open-label trial enrols older adults with mild to moderate CAP and frailty according to the Frailty Screening Index. Participants will be randomised using minimisation with the Age, Dehydration, Respiratory Failure, Orientation Disturbance and Low Blood Pressure score and Frailty Screening Index as allocation factors to receive either lascufloxacin switch therapy or ampicillin/sulbactam intravenous. The primary endpoint is the clinical cure rate at the test of cure. Secondary endpoints include early clinical response,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 80 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free