Evidence Hub

Immunomodulators, associated or not with systemic antibiotics, to treat periodontitis: A 1-year multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized clinical trial

Castro Dos Santos NC, Silva RNB, Colombo FS, Oliveira-Cardoso I, Súarez LJ, Martins R, de Figueiredo LC, Honório HM et al.

Journal of periodontology, 2026

109 participants

Abstract

Background: Immunomodulatory agents such as omega-3 (ω-3) and low-dose aspirin (ASA) have been proposed as effective adjuncts in the treatment of periodontitis. However, they still lack long-term studies and head-to-head evaluation with metronidazole (MTZ) and amoxicillin (AMX), the adjunct protocol with the strongest scientific evidence of clinical benefit. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effects of (ω)-3 and ASA, alone or combined with MTZ + AMX, to treat periodontitis.

Methods: Adults with stage III/IV periodontitis were randomly allocated to receive: (i) subgingival instrumentation (SI) and placebo; (ii) SI with adjunctive MTZ (400 mg) + AMX (500 mg) three times/day for 14 days (ATB); (iii) SI with adjunctive ω-3 (3 g) + ASA (100 mg/day) for 6 months (IM); and (iv) SI with adjunctive ATB and IM (ATB + IM). The patients were followed for 1 year post-therapy.

Results: 109 patients were included. At 1 year, 58.6%, 57.7%, and 57.1% of patients receiving ATB, IM, and ATB+IM, respectively, achieved the treatment endpoint [≤4 sites with a probing depth (PD) of ≥5 mm], compared with 23.1% in the SI group (p = 0.023). Each adjunctive therapy resulted in a greater reduction in the number of sites with PD≥5 mm compared with SI (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Adjunctive ATB, IM, or ATB+IM each provided clinically meaningful benefits beyond mechanical therapy. The results suggested no added benefit from combining ATB and IM. These findings support MTZ + AMX or ω-3 + ASA, without…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 109 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free