Evidence Hub

Associations between fatty acids providing support for n-3 and n-6 pathways are strongest in pregnant Indian vegetarians compared with pregnant Australian omnivores

Mugford M, Arman BM, Kumar K, Kaluve RS, Tran DXA, Best K, Yelland LN, Makrides M et al.

Prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and essential fatty acids, 2025

691 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Exclusion of meat and fish from the diet can lead to low levels of omega-3 (n-3) long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPUFAs), leaving the body reliant on dietary intake of n-3 α-linolenic acid (ALA) for endogenous conversion. This study compared dried blood spot fatty acid profiles from a large cohort of pregnant Indian women in Bengaluru, Karnataka, with self-reported vegetarian (n = 332) or omnivorous (n = 691) diets in the first trimester, to those of pregnant Australian women (n = 454) at a similar gestational age. Indian vegetarians and omnivores showed similar fatty acid profiles in dried blood spots but both had markedly lower n-3 fatty acids (mean total n-3 values: Indian 2.01% and 2.36% of total fatty acids respectively; 4.75% in Australian) with ALA, eicosapentaenoic acid, docosapentaenoic acid, and docosahexaenoic acid all less than half the Australian values. Both Indian groups also had lower arachidonic acid levels (mean 7.65% and 7.91% respectively, vs 8.50% in Australian omnivores), and higher linoleic acid levels (mean 22.53% and 22.41% respectively, vs 19.96% in Australian omnivores) compared with the Australian participants. In general, the relationships between n-3 fatty acids were stronger in Indian vegetarians than Indian omnivores, and weakest in Australian omnivores. These findings suggest that regardless of diet, Indian women in early pregnancy have lower n-3 LCPUFA status than Australian pregnant women. Our data are consistent with the idea that…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 691 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free