Evidence Hub

The ASSIST CLAD study: A phase 2 randomized controlled trial of mesenchymal stromal cells for new-onset chronic lung allograft dysfunction

Chambers DC, Westall G, Darley D, Musk M, Glanville AR, Malouf M, Holmes-Liew CL, Tan M et al.

The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation, 2026

41 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains the primary limitation to long-term survival after lung transplantation. We conducted a multicenter, phase 2, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of intravenous (IV) allogenic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) in lung transplant recipients with new-onset CLAD.

Methods: Participants (bilateral or single lung transplant, aged ≥18 years, >6 months post-transplant and with a persistent fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] and/or forced vital capacity [FVC] >20% from best post-transplant values within 12 months) were randomized (1:1, target n = 41 per arm) to receive MSC (2 × 10⁶ cells/kg IV twice weekly for 2 weeks) or placebo. The primary end-point was progression-free survival at 12 months, defined as a composite of all-cause mortality and freedom from CLAD progression (fall in FEV1 decline >10%).

Results: Fifty-nine participants were randomized. Fifty-eight received treatment (31 placebo; 27 MSC). MSC treatment did not improve progression-free survival: Seventeen of 31 (55%) in the placebo arm vs 11 of 27 (41%) in the MSC arm (relative risk 0.74 (0.42-1.29), p = 0.30). Lung function decline was similar between groups. The FEV1 slope (95% CI) declined by 6.43 (-11.78, -1.08) ml/week in the MSC group and 9.14 (-14.29, -3.99) ml/week in the placebo group (difference: 2.56 (-4.88, 9.99) ml/week, p = 0.50). FVC declined by 4.58 (-7.51, -1.65) ml/week in the MSC group and by 4.19…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 41 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free