Evidence Hub

Blood omega-3 biomarkers, diabetic retinopathy and retinal vessel status in patients with type 1 diabetes

Sala-Vila A, Vinagre I, Cofán M, Lázaro I, Alé-Chilet A, Barraso M, Hernandez T, Harris WS et al.

Eye (London, England), 2025

188 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Background/objectives: Clinical research on dietary omega-3 fatty acids and retinal health in type 1 diabetes (T1D) is scarce. In patients with T1D, we examined the associations between blood biomarkers of marine omega-3 (which reflect their dietary intake) and prevalent diabetic retinopathy (DR), and retinal microvascular data obtained through optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).

Subjects/methods: Exploratory, cross-sectional sub-study of a prospective, consecutive, large-scale OCTA study conducted in a longitudinal cohort (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03422965). We used baseline data from 188 consecutive patients with T1D and 88 controls. We determined blood omega-3 biomarkers (eicosapentaenoic [EPA], docosapentaenoic [DPA] and docosahexaenoic [DHA] acids) by gas-chromatography. Ocular data included DR grading, and 6 × 6 mm OCTA scans to obtain macular vessel density and perfusion density, and foveal avascular zone area, perimeter, and circularity.

Results: Patients with T1D, regardless of DR stage, showed significantly lower blood levels of EPA, DHA, DHA, and EPA + DHA than non-diabetic controls (P < 0.001, all cases). In multivariate models in patients with T1D, higher EPA was associated with a lower prevalence of DR (P = 0.044); and increasing proportions of DPA, DHA, EPA + DHA, and total marine omega-3 fatty acids related to a higher vessel and perfusion densities in the macula (P values from 0.014 to 0.050).

Conclusions: In patients with T1D, higher blood omega-3…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 188 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free