Evidence Hub

A Phase 1 Study Evaluating the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of Zerlasiran in Japanese Participants

Fok H, Harada-Shiba M, Rider D, Owada Y, Rambaran C

Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, 2026

18 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Aim: Zerlasiran is an N-acetylgalactosamine-conjugated small interfering RNA that targets lipoprotein(a), a risk factor for atherosclerosis and calcific aortic stenosis. Zerlasiran has not been studied in Japanese participants previously.

Method: This was an open-label, single-dose trial that enrolled 18 adult participants with lipoprotein(a) levels ≥ 70 nmol/L at a single site in Japan to evaluate subcutaneous doses of zerlasiran (30 mg, 100 mg, and 300 mg) in three ascending-dose cohorts. The participants were monitored for 150 days post-dose to assess the systemic pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics (lipoprotein (a) and lipid biomarkers), and safety.

Results: Following dosing, median Tmax was reached at 5 hours with plasma concentrations gradually declining to undetectable levels by 36 hours, with t1/2 approximately 4 hours. Both Cmax and AUC0-inf increased in a dose-dependent manner. The maximum median (interquartile range [IQR]) percent reduction in lipoprotein (a) in the 30 mg, 100 mg, and 300 mg cohorts were -72.8% (-79.7%, -67.1%), 88.8% (-89.5%, -84.7%), and -97.8% (-98.6, -96.9%), respectively, between days 30 and 60, with a sustained effect observed at 150 days at all dose levels. All adverse events were mild and self-limiting.

Conclusion: Zerlasiran was well tolerated with no significant safety findings observed at any dose level. A typical pharmacokinetic profile expected of an N-acetylgalactosamine-conjugated small interfering RNA, coupled with a potent and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 18 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free